

Excel needs to have information to allow it to paste keeping the formula and updating its formula for addressing changes.

Excel does place the copied material on the clipboard, but then interjects its own actions when you paste IN EXCEL from that clipboard material. Have you ever received the warning that something went wrong with a copy/paste action you took? And that you can still, even in the face of that failure, use the clipboard contents for pasting into other programs. That's actually one of the reasons for the Windows clipboard.) And in Excel's case at least, it was also necessary because of the particular complicated world of spreadsheet needs. (Yes, "back in the day" even programs from the same company often had little or no interoperability. Not just that, but also, perhaps, to help their ballyhoo-ed interoperability. It's fairly clear that they both had routines written to enable copying and pasting in the days before widespread use of Windows. Normally I would suggest this is due to the particular requirements of spreadsheet work in general except that Word has its own uniqueness where this subject is concerned and both of them have had such from their beginnings. Excel is the one failing to honor the Windows clipboard paradigm. Excel has ALWAYS required the "cumbersome" workaround you allude to in order to paste into a cell's contents vs.

When you copy a CELL, whole, Excel will only paste it whole, not inside a cell as part of that cell's contents. What you describe, literally, in your numbered example set of actions is how Excel has always worked. I think this is a "new" change as I started getting annoyed by copy/paste operations starting to fail not that long ago. However, if you try to cut + paste, the origin cell won't be cleared this way.

